tag:bratha.blog.co.uk,2009-11-10:/MokoFeed2009-11-10T08:21:58+01:00tag:bratha.blog.co.uk,2007-09-25:/2007/09/22/p19bn_for_education_education_education~3022228/#c4744813gelöschter User2007-09-25T17:59:54+02:002007-09-25T17:59:54+02:001: positive statement is correct, but the second statement can be quantified and therefore proved or disproved. 2/4<br> 2: 3/3<br> 3: 3/3<br> 4: 0/2 - you can post images on your blog Brath, use the image poster on the right of the editor window.<br> 5: 0/4<br> 6: 1/3 see below for correct answer<br> http://kurrenseconomicsblog.blog.co.uk/2007/09/20/education_education_education~3014311<br> 7: 6/6 - interesting transport discussion.<br> <br> 13/23tag:bratha.blog.co.uk,2007-09-17:/2007/09/11/title~2961181/#c4668621PB2007-09-17T17:57:58+02:002007-09-17T17:57:58+02:00In question 2 when you get an economics term like 'opportunity cost' it is good practise to always define that term. It will usually get you a mark and is good habit to get into as it gives your the basis from which to form your analysis. You list lots of things that would be forgone but could relate them more closely to the factors of production. Remember you are economist now and must be precise. <br> <br> Good use of source material throughout ensures you will get application marks.